Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45528 (KAR)

SMT BRUNDHA K R v. MR DHARSHAN GOWDA S B

CP/8/2026 · 2026-02-04

P Sree Sudha

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6586 CP No. 8 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA CIVIL PETITION NO. 8 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SMT. BRUNDHA K.R, W/O DHARSHAN GOWDA S.B, D/O RAVI KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO 114, 2ND CROSS, 6TH MAIN, KASTHURIBANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 002. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKAR H.S., ADVOCATE) AND: MR. DHARSHAN GOWDA S.B, S/O BASAVARAJU S, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO.21, 1ST BLOCK, 12TH MAIN ROAD, BANDEPALYA, VASPALYA, BENGALURU - 560 068. …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 24 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908 PRAYING TO TRANSFER THE PETITION IN MC.NO.74/2023, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT TO THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6586 CP No. 8 of 2026 THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the appellant is present. In spite of service of notice, respondent did not turn up and remained ex-parte. 2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the appellant. 3. This transfer petition is filed by petitioner-wife for transfer of MC.No.74/2023 filed by respondent-husband for divorce before the Senior Civil Judge and J.M.F.C., Channapatna, Ramanagara District to the Family Court, Bengaluru. 4. It is stated that the petitioner-wife filed complaint in Crime No.67/2024 under Section 498A of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 within the jurisdiction of the Bengaluru Courts. The respondent-husband is also working as FDA in Karnataka Bhovi Development Corporation, Bengaluru, as he is native of Channapatna, he filed divorce petition before the Channapatna Court only to harass her. The - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6586 CP No. 8 of 2026 distance between Channapatna and Bengaluru is 57 kilometers. Their marriage was performed on 25.05.2022 and they are not blessed with children. 5. Considering the reasons stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that respondent is also working in Bengaluru, this court finds it reasonable to transfer MC.No.74/2023 from the Senior Civil Judge and J.M.F.C., Channapatna, Ramanagara District to the Family Court, Bengaluru. 6. In the result, the petition is allowed. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46