30.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L.600. Rakib (Partly Allowed) CRM (A) 3105 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chopra Police Station case no. 645 of 2026 dated 17.08.2026 under Sections 109/115(2)/118(2)/126(2)/3(5)/303(2)/329(4)/74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Sidhu Biswas & Ors. ……Petitioners. Mr. Kazi M. Rahman ......for the Petitioners. Mr. Ajoy Roy Mr. Bibaswan Mukherjee ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submit that petitioners are innocent and over a dispute relating to betel nut tree the situation escalated and subsequently petitioners have been foisted with the present criminal case. Learned advocate appearing for the State has produced the Case Diary, drawn the attention of the Court to the injury report, there are injuries which has been inflicted. Having considered the materials appearing in the Case Diary with respect to the each of the accused persons, I am of the opinion that so far as the petitioner no.1 namely, Sidhu Biswas and petitioner no.2, namely, Rohit Biswas are concerned, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner no.3, namely, Priya Biswas, petitioner no.4, namely, Indrani Biswas @ 2 Mamoni Biswas and petitioner no.5, namely, Chumki Biswas @ Chumki Ghosh is hereby allowed. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner nos. 3, 4 and 5 shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation of the case is still in progress, the petitioner nos. 3, 4 and 5 shall make themselves available as and when required by the Investigating Officer of the case for the sake of investigation. Accordingly, CRM (A) 3105 of 2026 is partly allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)