IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90627 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2025 Thana- MOHANPUR District- Jamui ====================================================== Sanjiv Singh @ Sabjeev Kumar Singh Son of Sambhu Singh @ Sambhu Prasad R/o Village - Kakanchor, P.S.- Mohanpur, District - Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Niranjan Parihar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 4 13-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No. 126 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 30.10.2025 at about 04:00 a.m., Sanjiv Kumar Singh (petitioner) assaulted the informant’s wife with a lathi causing fractures, and also injured Ashish Kumar Singh by pelting stones, with Arti Singh and Sandhiya Kumari threatening to kill. It is further alleged that stones were pelted on the house of Pramanand Singh causing injury to his daughter-in-law and damage to the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90627 of 2025(4) dt.13-01-2026 2/3 roof. 4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 31.10.2025. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application. 5. It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that parties are agnates and there is subsisting land dispute between the parties. There is case and counter case between the parties. Injury sustained by the wife of the informant is found to be grievous in nature, though the same is not inflicted on the vital part. Charge sheet has already been submitted in this case. 6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 8. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90627 of 2025(4) dt.13-01-2026 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No. 126 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. Raj Kishore/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T