Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 455 (RAJ)

KARINA KUMARI MEENA D/O SHRI RAMJI LAL MEENA, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/388/2026 · 2026-03-17

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11339] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 388/2026 1. Karina Kumari Meena D/o Shri Ramji Lal Meena, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Badi Kothi, Tehsil Lalsot, Po Dungarpur, District Dausa, Rajasthan - 303511 (Aadhaar Card No. 7973 7602 1225) 2. Ankit Kumar Meena S/o Shri Jagdish Meena, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Jopara, Po Thikariya, District Dausa, Rajasthan - 303509 . (Aadhaar Card No. 3344 2340 7665) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General Of Police, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 4. The Station House Officer, Police Station Maanpur, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 5. Sunny S/o Ramji Lal Meena, , R/o Badi Kothi, Tehsil Lalsot, Po Dungarpur, District Dausa, Rajasthan - 303511. (Brother Of Petitioner No. 1) 6. Rajesh S/o Ramji Lal Meena, R/o Badi Kothi, Tehsil Lalsot, Po Dungarpur, District Dausa, Rajasthan - 303511. (Brother Of Petitioner No. 1) 7. Naresh Meena S/o Ramji Lal Meena, R/o Badi Kothi, Tehsil Lalsot, Po Dungarpur, District Dausa, Rajasthan - 303511. (Cousin Brother Of Petitioner No. 1) 8. Ramji Lal Meena S/o Solya Ram, R/o Badi Kothi, Tehsil Lalsot, Po Dungarpur, District Dausa, Rajasthan - 303511. (Father Of Petitioner No. 1) 9. Phoolchand S/o Solya Ram, R/o Badi Kothi, Tehsil Lalsot, Po Dungarpur, District Dausa, Rajasthan - 303511. (Uncle Of Petitioner No. 1) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP [2026:RJ-JP:11339] (2 of 3) [CRLW-388/2026] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 17/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 to 9 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Sanstha, Naya Kheda, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur on 05.03.2026. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.5 to 9 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4-Station House Officer, Police Station Maanpur, District Dausa, Rajasthan and respondent no.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed [2026:RJ-JP:11339] (3 of 3) [CRLW-388/2026] before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /199