Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45477 (CAL)

SAMIEL @ SYAMIEL @ SAMEIYEL BISWAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(M)/2408/2026 · 2026-09-29

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

29.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L.493. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (M) 2408 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Bhimpur P.S. Case no. 169 of 2026 dated 21.05.2026 under Sections 137(2)/140(3)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Samiel @ Syamiel @ Sameiyel Biswas ……Petitioner. Mr. Saryati Dutta Mr. Amanul Islam Mr. Sourav Mukherjee Mr. Gourab Patra .....for the Petitioner. Mr. A. Kr. Biswas .....for the De-facto complainant. Mr. Insradip Das Ms. Nabanita Chatterjee ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for more than four months, charge-sheet has been submitted, however, further progress is awaiting in the case. Learned advocate appearing for the de-facto complainant is present. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail, draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the victim under Section 183 of BNSS. I have taken into account the overall materials in the present case and is of the view that further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. As such, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. 2 Accordingly, the petitioner, namely, Samiel @ Syamiel @ Sameiyel Biswas shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under POCSO Act, Tehatta, Nadia. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of Nadia without prior permission of the learned Special Court. Thus, CRM (M) No. 2408 of 2026 is allowed. The observations made above are only restricted for adjudication of the bail application and should not be considered a final opinion on the merits of the case. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)