Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45476 (CAL)

DIBAKAR MONDAL AND ORS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/26549/2026 · 2026-09-29

Dinesh Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

31 2299..0099..22002266 Court No. 2 pp WPA 26549 of 2026 Dibakar Mondal & Ors. vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Saikat Chatterjee … for the petitioner. Mr. Samrat Mukherjee, Ms. Sabita Roy, Mr. Amlan Kr. Mukherjee, … for the State. 1. Learned counsel for the State under instructions states that let the petitioner move a representation before the respondents and the respondents shall consider the same in accordance with law. Learned counsel submits that the representation may be considered in view of the proceedings of the meeting of RTA, South 24-Parganas held on 23rd April, 2025. 2. In view of the submissions made, let the present writ petition be treated as representation. 3. The respondents shall consider and decide the same expeditiously preferably within six weeks in accordance with law after giving the parties an opportunity of being heard. The authority shall communicate the decision within two weeks of such decision. 2 4. Since the affidavit has not been filed, the averments made in the petition are not deemed to have been admitted. 5. This Court has not gone into the merits of the case and no expression made herein shall tantamount to be an expression on the merits of the case. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. 7. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)