SUMITRA DEVI AGARWAL v. MR. ROHAN LASKMIKANT JOSHI AND ORS
CPAN/659/2007 · 2026-09-30
Partha Pratim Roy, Tapabrata Chakraborty
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 45475 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 45475 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
30.09.2026 Item Nos. 17 – 19 Court No.11 KCP
CPAN 661 of 2007 Sumitra Devi Agarwalla & ors. – Versus – Sukumar Singha Ray & ors.
+ IA No.CAN 3 of 2017 (Old No.CAN 7954 of 2017) in WPLRT 1115 of 2001
with
CPAN 660 of 2007 Sri Rajendra Agarwal & Others – Versus – Sukumar Singha Ray & Others in WPLRT 1420 of 2001
+ IA No.: CAN 1 of 2002 (Old No.: CAN 9251 of 2002)
with CPAN 659 of 2007 Sumitra Devi Agarwal – Versus – Sukumar Singha Ray & Others in WPLRT 1419 of 2001
+ IA No.: CAN 1 of 2002 (Old No.: CAN 9269 of 2002)
Mr. Pradip Kumar Roy, Sr. Adv., Ms. Soumita Chakraborty Ms. Shruti Mitra … for the petitioners [in all the matters]
Mr. Nilanjan Bhattacharya, Ld. Sr. Stng. Consl. Mr. Ajit Kumar Mishra, Ld. A.G.P. Ms. Jayita Dhar Chakraborty
Mr. Nilanjan Pal
….for the alleged Contemnors [in all the matters]
Mr. Mishra, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the alleged contemnors submits that the
order of this Court has already been complied with. Let the affidavit-in-compliance, as filed today, be kept on record. A
2 copy of the same has also been handed over to Mr. Roy, learned senior advocate appearing for the writ petitioners. As the order of this Court has already been complied with, we are not inclined to proceed with the contempt applications any further and, accordingly, the same are
disposed of.
(Partha Pratim Roy, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)