Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4547 (AP)

Dudekula Jalaligari Hussain Basha @ Jalaligari Hussain v. Dudekula Mastanvali,

CRLP/1355/2021 · 2026-06-29

Tuhin Kumar Gedela

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Nil Date of pronouncement : 30.06.2026 Date of uploading : 09.07.2026 APHC010083582021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3548] TUESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1355/2021 Between: 1. DUDEKULA JALALIGARI HUSSAIN BASHA @ JALALIGARI HUSSAIN, BASHA,S/C CHINNA HUSSIAN,AGED 30 YEARS OCC RTC CONSTABLE, DOOR NO 6./60 KANALA VILLAGE NANDYALA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. DUDEKULA MASTANVALI, S/O LATE D.MAHABOOB PEERA,AGED 28 YEARS,OCC BUSINESS,KAALA VILLAGE,NANDAYAL MANDAL,KURNOOL DISTRICT 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF AP AT AMARAVATHI. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to quash all further proceedings against the petitioner in F.I.R No.818 of 2020 of Tadiparti Town Police Station under Ananthapur District on the basis of the false complaint filed by the de facto complaint and may pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 2 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in FIR No. 818 of 2020 of Tadipatri Town Police Station under Ananthapur District on the basis of the false complaint of the de facto complainant pending disposal of the main petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. G ABDUL KHADER Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: On 25.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed on 28.07.2025. Even on the said date, there was no representation and the matter was directed to be listed again on 11.08.2025. On 18.06.2026, the matter again surfaced, and even on that date, there was no representation. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears to this Court that neither the petitioner nor the learned counsel for the petitioner is evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution. As a sequel, the Interlocutory Applications, if any, pending in the Criminal Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Date: 30.06.2026 DSV Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 103 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1355/2021 30.06.2026 DSV 5 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1355/2021 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 30.06.2026 GTK, J Criminal Petition is dismissed for Non- prosecution. (vide separate order) _______ GTK,J DSV 6