- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3687 WP No. 439 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 439 OF 2026 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. H. RASHMI W/O SRI. CHIKKASIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO. CH-55, 8TH CROSS, NEW MODEL HOUSE, ASHOKAPURAM, MYSORE-570 008. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. J. SATHISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MYSURU-570 001. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHI V., HCGP FOR R2; SRI. T.P. VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R1) Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3687 WP No. 439 of 2026 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE REVISIONAL AUTHORITY TO DISPOSE OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-G. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B-GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: “a. Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Revisional Authority to dispose of the Revision Petition filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-'G'. b. Grant such other order(s) or direction(s) as may be deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity”. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the revision petition which has been filed on 4.1.2024 is still pending. 3. Learned AGA had been called upon to obtain instructions and make her submissions. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3687 WP No. 439 of 2026 4. She submits that the matter is now posted for hearing. If both the petitioner and respondent No.1 were to co-operate, produce documents in support of their respective case and address their arguments, the orders would be passed within 30 days of the arguments being concluded. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would address her arguments and on the very next date the matter is listed. 6. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that he would also produce necessary file and documents in support of the case of respondent No.1, on the next date of hearing. 7. In view of their submissions, respondent no.2 is directed to dispose the revision petition within 30 days after the date of which petitioner and respondent no.1 were to conclude their arguments. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3687 WP No. 439 of 2026 8. With the above observation, the petition is disposed of. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE TL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27