Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 25568 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WP No. 25568 of 2026 Dineshkumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Secretary Labour and Employee department, Secretariat Chennai 9. 2. The Commissioner Commissionerate of Labour, B, Block 6th Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai 40. 3. Employees Provident Fund organisation Rep by Regional provident Fund commissioner, royapettah High Road chennai 14
4. Employees State Insurance Corporation Sterling Road, Chennai 34
5. Kritika Fibre Product Rep by its proprietor Raju Arjunan 1827 Nagathamman koil street, boomadevi Nagar, Gerugambakam, Chennai 122 ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 25568 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to dispose the petitioner representation dated 17.02.2026 and pass For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.J.Nissar Ahmed For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Vishnu for R3 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the fifth respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.02.2026. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he was employed with the fifth respondent (Kritika Fibre Product) for a period of ten years. However, his Provident Fund (PF) and Employees' State Insurance (ESI) benefits were not granted to him. Hence, petitioner made a representation on 17.02.2026 before the fifth respondent. Since there is no response, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition. 3. Heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the third respondent and perused the records. 4. When this Court questioned the learned counsel for the petitioner regarding the employee code and the employee's Universal Account Number https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 25568 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 (UAN), it was stated that no such numbers were provided by the employer. If that is the grievance, it is always open to the petitioner to workout his remedy before the competent Court/ Tribunal, in the manner known to law. This Court, therefore, is not inclined to entertain the present Writ Petition. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. K.SURENDER J. 07-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No JAI To
1. The Secretary Labour and Employee department, Secretariat Chennai 9. 2. The Commissioner Commissionerate of Labour, B, Block 6th Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai 40. 3.
Employees Provident Fund organization Rep by Regional provident Fund commissioner, royapettah High Road chennai 14. 4. Employees State Insurance Corporation Sterling Road, Chennai 34. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 25568 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 K.SURENDER J. JAI WP No. 25568 of 2026 07-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis