Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4543 (JHR)

SURENDRA KUMAR SINGH v. ALKA TIWARY, THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/616/2025 · 2026-01-16

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:1302 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.616 of 2025 ------- 1. Surendra Kumar Singh aged about 65 years S/o Late Muni Lal Singh, R/o Flat No.102 Joy Villa, behind A.G. Office, North Office Para, Doranda, District Ranchi. 2. Pravin Chandra Gupta aged about 62 years Son of Late Prakash Chandra Gupta, resident of Prakash Villa, Aryapuri, Ratu Road, P.O.-P.S.-Sukhdeo Nagar G.P.O., District-Ranchi. 3. Arbind Prasad aged about 62 years, son of Nathun Barai, resident of St.Vinoba Nagar Merawl, P.O. Sindur P.S.- Korra District- Hazaribagh. 4. Manoj Kumar Laheri aged about 62 years, son of Vishwanath Prasad, resident of Bazar Gwal Toli, Ravindra Path, P.O. Bara Bazar, Hazaribagh. P.S.- Sadar, District- Hazaribagh. 5. Rajesh Kumar aged about 62 years. Son of Late Suresh Prasad Sinha, resident of Flat No. 201, Block- A, Pebble Bay Apartment Gautam Budha Marg, Bariyatu Road Ranchi, P.O. & P.S. Bariatu, District- Ranchi. 6. Dinesh Upadhyay aged about 65 years, son of Janmejay Upadhyay, resident of Bandhgari Deepatoli, Lata Clinic lane No-4, P.O. Booty, and P.S. District, Ranchi. 7. Ram Sewak Ram aged about 65 years, son of Late Ram sunder Ram, resident of Pathal Kudwa more near L.P. School Purulia Road, Ranchi, P.O.-G.P.O.,P.S.- Kotwali, District-Ranchi. 8. Prakash Kumar aged about 62 years, son of Late Amrendra Nath Singh, resident of Mohalla Chittaur 2026:JHHC:1302 2 Tetar Toli, P.O. & P.S.- Bariatu, District- Ranchi- 834009. 9. Vinod Kumar Singh aged about 64 years, son of Late Ambika Prasad, resident of Flat No-4C, Block A, Narayan Enclave, Harihar Singh Road, Morhabadi, P.O. Ranchi University, P.S.-Bariatu, District- Ranchi, 834008. 10. Lakhan Lal Rajak aged about 62 years, son of Late Ratan Lal Rajak, resident of Harmu Housing Colony, LIG No.262, P.O. Harmu, P.S.-Argora. District- Ranchi 11. Ashok Tirkey, aged about 65 years, son of Mangra Tirkey, resident of Village Tirilpiri Sukurhutu Siladon, P.O. Hulhundu, P.S.-Dhurwa, Ranchi, District- Ranchi. 12. Ram Nath Ram, aged about 65 years, son of Late Bhawani Ram, resident of Vidya Nagar, Pandra, O.P.. Ratu Road, Ranchi, District Ranchi. 13. Uday Pratap Choudhary, aged about 63 years, son of Late Keshav Choudhary, resident of village Malpura, P.O.. Sakla Bazar, P.S.Godri (Karakat), District-Rohtas (Bihar) 14. Baleshwar Dwivedi, aged about 63 years, son of Late Ram Rahasya Dwivedi, resident of Hesag (Donbosco Field Corner) P.O. Hatia, P.s. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi(Jharkhand) ...… Petitioners Versus 1 Alka Tiwary, the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O & P.S. Dhurwa ,District Ranchi. 2. Kripanand Jha, the Secretary, Schedule Tribe, Schedule Caste, Minority and backward class Welfare Department, Project Building, P.O & P.S. Dhurwa ,District Ranchi. 2026:JHHC:1302 3 3. Neeraj Kumari, the Joint Secretary, Schedule Tribe, Schedule Caste, Minority and backward class Welfare Department, Project Building, P.O & P.S. Dhurwa ,District Ranchi. 4. Anil Kumar, under Secretary, Schedule Tribe, Schedule Caste, Minority and backward class Welfare Department, Project Building, P.O & P.S. Dhurwa ,District Ranchi (Jharkhand). 5. The State of Jharkhand. .….Opp. Parties ------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Jayant Kumar Pandey, Adv. For the O.P- State : Mr. Mithilesh Singh, G.A.IV ------- 04/Dated:16.01.2026 1. It has been informed by the counsel for the respondent-State that as per the Writ Court’s order, honorarium has been paid to the petitioners and the same has been mentioned at the paragraph no.5 of the show-cause dated 09.01.2026. 2. In view of the paragraph no.5 of the show cause dated 09.01.2026, no contempt is made out. Accordingly, the instant application stands dismissed. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to raise their grievance, if any, if so advised. (Deepak Roshan, J.) January 16, 2026 Fahim/- Uploaded on 21/01/2026