Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45416 (MAD)

Ms MVR Enterprises v. The State Tax Officer

WP/23977/2026 · 2026-07-06

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 23977 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 23977 of 2026 and WMP.No.26060 of 2026 M/s. M.V.R. Enterprises Rep by its Prop Rupadevi Ramamoorthy Survey 204/1ac,1b and 1d,Vadaalapiranthan Village, Cheyyar Taluk, Tiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu 604 407. ..Petitioner Vs The State Tax Officer Office of the Commercial Tax Officer, Vandavasi Assessment Circle, Tiruvannamalai. ..Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the Respondent in the order vide GSTIN 33ATHPR1797B1ZN/2020-2021, dated 13.03.2026 along with Consequential order through FORM GST DRC-07 bearing Ref No ZD330326117286K, dated 13.03.2026 under Section 74 of the act for the financial year 2020-2021, to quash the same. For Petitioner: Ms. R. Hemalatha For Respondent: Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Counsel (Tax) ORDER This is the second round of litigation. The petitioner had earlier approached this Court in W.P.No.46517 of 2025. Subject to payment of 10% of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23977 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 the disputed tax amount, the order impugned therein was set aside and the matter was remanded. Upon such remand, impugned order dated 13.03.2026 was issued. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the implementation of the order ought to have been kept in abeyance in view of pending proceedings before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. 3. Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice for the respondent. 4. In similar matters, the implementation of orders upon remand has been directed to be kept in abeyance pending adjudication by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of the question of law. A similar order shall enure to the benefit of the petitioner. Subject to these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 06-07-2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23977 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To The State Tax Officer Office of the Commercial Tax Officer, Vandavasi Assessment Circle, Tiruvannamalai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23977 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 23977 of 2026 and WMP.No.26060 of 2026 06-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis