IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90806 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76087 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-610 Year-2025 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1. Sabita Davi @ Babita Devi @ Savita Devi Wife of Harendra Paswan @ Harind paswan Resident of Village- Kuari Khurd, P.s.- Hajipur Sadar, and Dist.- Vaishali 2. Hulsi Devi Wife of Mahendra Paswan @ Mahindra Paswan Resident of Village- Kuari Khurd, P.s.- Hajipur Sadar, and Dist.- Vaishali 3. Neetu Devi @ Nitu Devi Wife of Kamal Paswan Resident of Village- Kuari Khurd, P.s.- Hajipur Sadar, and Dist.- Vaishali 4. Mahendra Paswan @ Mahindra Paswan son of Inrpat Paswan Resident of Village- Kuari Khurd, P.s.- Hajipur Sadar, and Dist.- Vaishali 5. Harendra Paswan @ Harind Paswan son of Mahendra Paswan @ Mahindra Paswan Resident of Village- Kuari Khurd, P.s.- Hajipur Sadar, and Dist.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 16-01-2026 Learned Advocate for the respective parties are present. 2. The present application has been filed seeking modification of the order dated 26.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.76087 of 2025, whereby while extending the privilege of anticipatory bail, one of the conditions was “One of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioners”. 3. Learned Advocate for the petitioners submitted that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90806 of 2025(2) dt.16-01-2026 2/2 all the family members of the petitioners have been made accused in the present case and there is none to stand as bailor on theirs behalf. 3. In view of the submissions advanced by the learned Advocate for the petitioner and taking note of the averments made in the modification application, the same stands allowed. 4. The condition to the extent that “One of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioners” shall be read as “One of the bailors shall be the local residents of the petitioners”. 5. The period for furnishing bail bond is extended for a further period of four weeks from today. 6. The order dated 26.11.2025 stands modified to the extent indicated above. rohit/- (Harish Kumar, J) U T