Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45405 (KAR)

SMT V SHARADAMMA v. THE SECRETARY

WP/97/2026 · 2026-01-07

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:699 WP No. 97 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 97 OF 2026 (MV) BETWEEN: SMT. V.SHARADAMMA, W/O LATE PRASANNA H.V., AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, PROP: S.S.G.K.S. TRAVELS, BRAHMIN STREET, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT - 572202. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.S.PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, B.H. ROAD, TUMKURU - 572103. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. RASHMI RAO, HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.A.S.Paras Kumar, counsel for the petitioner and High Court Government Pleader appeared in person. Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:699 WP No. 97 of 2026 High Court Government Pleader is directed to accept notice for respondent. 2. Though the petition is listed for admission, with the consent it is heard finally. 3. The petitioner contends that she has submitted an application before the respondent on 13.10.2025 vide Annexure-K. Her grievance is that the same has not been considered as of today. 4. The court has perused Annexure-K, it is the representation submitted by the petitioner and the same has not been considered as of today. Therefore, this court deems it proper to issue mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on or before 28.02.2026 in accordance with law. 5. With the above observation, writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10