- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3290 WP No. 341 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 341 OF 2026 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SRI LOKESH K S S/ O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT 2ND CROSS, BEHIND RV SCHOOL, PETICHAMANAHALLI, KOLAR-563101. 2. SMT.R. SARAVANI C/O SRI. LOKESH.K.S. AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT 2ND CROSS, BEHIND RV SCHOOL, PETICHAMANAHALLI, KOLAR-563101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GAGAN RAJ.,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3290 WP No. 341 of 2026 AND: 1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER CANARA BANK., WARD NO 24, KEELUKOTE EXTENSION, ANTHARAGANGE MAIN ROAD, KOLAR-563101. 2. E-AUCTION SERVICE PROVIDER E-BKRAY (M/S PSB ALLIANCE PVT. LTD) (CONTACT NO.7046612345/6354910172, /8291220220 / 9892219848/ 8160205051, EMAIL SUPPORT.EBKRAY @ PSBALLIANCE.COM/ SUPPORT.EBKRAY @ PROCURE247.COM) AUTHORISED OFFICER CANARA BANK, KOLAR BRANCH. KOLAR-563101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VINAY BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 IN CP 28143/25) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI BY SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED SALE NOTICE DATED. 15-04-2025, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENTS BANK, WHEREIN FIXED THE SALE NOTICE DATED.21-05-2025, ISSUED BY THE CANARA BANK KOLAR BRANCH AT ANNEXURE-G. KOLAR, VIDE NO625/GVP/SN/539/160000990504 REFERENCE WHICH IS AT ANNX-G. (B) GRANT SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER RELIEFS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3290 WP No. 341 of 2026 BASED ON THE NATURE AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE ABOVE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioners filed this writ petition challenging the sale notice dated 15.04.2025, issued by respondent No.1 Bank, wherein fixed the sale E-auction notice dated 21.05.2025 issued by the Canara Bank, Kolar Branch, Kolar, vide Annexure-G. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that pursuant to the sale notice dated 15.04.2025, there were no bidders. Hence, the respondent bank could not auction the property under the sale notice on 15.04.2025. 3. Prior to filing of the writ petition, the respondents have issued a fresh sale notice on 15.11.2025, and - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3290 WP No. 341 of 2026 pursuant to the sale notice, the respondent bank had auctioned the property and issued a sale certificate to the auction purchaser. The petitioner has produced a sale notice and sale certificate. Same is placed on record. In view of the same, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. 4. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following order: ORDER i. The writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. ii. A liberty is reserved to the petitioners to challenge the sale notice dated 15.11.2025, and sale certificate before the appropriate forum, if so desired. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SKS CT:KHV