Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 454 (JHR)

RAJESH AGRAWAL v. PAPPY SINGH ALIAS PAYAL SINGH

FA/331/2023 · 2026-01-20

Arun Kumar Rai, Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:1464-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No.331 of 2023 Rajesh Agrawal, son of Murarilal Agrawal, aged about 44 years, resident of Village-Palbagan, Mihijam, P.O. and P.S. Mihijam, District-Jamtara … Appellant Versus Pappy Singh @ Payal Singh, D/o Ram Bilash Prasad and wife of Rajesh Agrawal, aged about 35 years, resident of Bishnu Bihar Colony, Kulti, P.O. and P.S. Kulti, District- East Burdwan (West Bengal). … Respondent ---------- Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------- For the Appellant : Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate ----- Order No.09/Dated: 20.01.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Although, we have not called upon the appellant-husband, namely, Rajesh Agrawal, but he is also present in the Court. 3. Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, learned counsel on the instruction of the appellant-husband, namely, Rajesh Agrawal has submitted that he does not intend to press this appeal, since, he is ready to make payment of the amount of permanent alimony determined to the tune of Rs. 5 Lacs, in two installments maximum within a period of four months. 4. There is no opposition on behalf of the respondent-wife, who is being represented by Mr. Arun Kumar. 2026:JHHC:1464-DB 2 5. According to the undertaking furnished by the respondent-husband, namely, Rajesh Agrawal, he will make payment of Rs. 5 Lacs, in two installments maximum within a period of four months. 6. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as not pressed and, as such, disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) 20th January, 2026 R.K/Rajnish