BUDHABHAI @ NARESHBHAI DHIRUBHAI AAHIR @ DANGAR v. STATE OF GUJARAT
SCR.A/1827/2026 · 2026-03-18
M R Mengdey
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 454 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 454 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
R/SCR.A/1827/2026 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (FOR CONSENT QUASHING) NO. 1827 of 2026 ========================================================== BUDHABHAI @ NARESHBHAI DHIRUBHAI AAHIR @ DANGAR & ANR. Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ========================================================== Appearance: MS ALPA J DAVE(3924) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2 MR.HARDIK SONI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY
Date : 18/03/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. Present Petition is preferred by the Petitioners (Original Accused) under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No.11198067250907 of 2025 registered with Vartej Police Station, Bhavnagar for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(2), 351(2) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 5, 33, 40, 42(a) and 42(d) of the Money Laundering Act.
2. Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioners and learned APP for the Respondent – State. Learned Advocate Mr. K. I. Kazi appears and states that he has received instructions to appear on behalf of Respondent No.2 – Original Complainant and he would be filing his appearance. Registry to accept the Vakalatnama.
3. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice for and on
R/SCR.A/1827/2026 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026 behalf of the respondent – State and learned Advocate appearing for the respondent complainant waives service of Rule on behalf of the Original Complainant.
4. Learned Advocate for the Petitioners has submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and they are now not willing to proceed with the complaint any further.
5. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf Original Complainant has placed on record the Affidavit dated
18.03.2026. He submitted that matter has been amicably settled between the parties and there is no objection if present Petition is allowed.
6. Considering averments made in the Affidavit as also the
submissions made by the learned Advocates for the respective parties, the present Application deserves to be allowed and is hereby allowed. The FIR No.11198067250907 of 2025 registered with Vartej Police Station, Bhavnagar for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(2), 351(2) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 5, 33, 40, 42(a) and 42(d) of the Money Laundering Act is hereby quashed and set aside qua the present Petitioners. Rule is made absolute.
(M. R. MENGDEY,J) NABILA Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: NABILABANU MOHAMADNOOR PATNIJAMAT(HC00630), Private Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 25/03/2026 10:41:54