Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 454 (GAU)

SANJAY AGARWAL v. NIVEDITA AGARWAL

I.A.(Civil)/3171/2023 · 2026-02-10

Kaushik Goswami

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010023422026 2026:GAU-AS:1870 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3171/2023 SANJAY AGARWAL S/O- SRI ASHOK AGARWAL R/O- N.S.C.B. ROAD HOJAI DIST. HOJAI ASSAM PIN- 782435. VERSUS NIVEDITA AGARWAL W/O- SRI SANJAY AGARWAL (ISWARWALIA) (NEWLY MARRIED HUSBAND) R/O- HANUMAN BHAWAN FLAT NO. 32 THIRD FLOOR MARWARI PATTY A.T. ROAD P.S. AND DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PRESENTLY RESIDING AT SECTOR-1 MANIK CH. DAS PATH CHALIHA NAGAR P.O. AND DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. R L YADAV Advocate for : MR. N HASAN appearing for NIVEDITA AGARWAL Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : SANJAY AGARWAL VERSUS NIVEDITA AGARWAL ------------ Advocate for : MR. R L YADAV Advocate for : appearing for NIVEDITA AGARWAL BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 11-02-2026 Heard Ms. M. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. 2. It is submitted that the parties have amicably entered into a settlement of their disputes and accordingly, joint petition has been filed before the Court of learned Addl. District Judge, Dibrugarh, wherein the learned Addl. District Judge, Dibrugarh by Judgment and Decree dated 25.03.2025 disposed of Title Suit No.(D) 30/2022. 3. Ms. M. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that she has instructions not to press the instant I.A. filed for condoning the delay occurred in filing the connected Civil Revision petition. 4. In view of the compromise arrived between the parties and in view of the Page No.# 3/3 endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the applicant, the I.A. stands dismissed on being withdrawn. JUDGE Comparing Assistant