Vallarasu v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police
/16918/2026 · 2026-07-03
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 45396 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 45396 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 16918 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 16918 of 2026 Vallarasu ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police Erumapatty Police Station, Namakkal. Crime No.66 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.66 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Dhasarathan For Respondent(s): Mr.N.Palanivel Government Advocate (Criminal side) ORDER The petitioner, apprehending arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 5 (I), 5 (j) (ii) and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, in Crime No.66 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is aged approximately twenty-two years and the victim is approximately seventeen years. It is alleged that the petitioner became acquainted with the defacto-complainant, made her fall in love with him and committed sexual assault against her. Hence, the case. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 16918 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that both the petitioner and the defacto-complainant were in a consensual relationship. He also stated that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the victim is approximately seventeen years old and that the petitioner committed sexual assault on her, as a result of which the victim girl became pregnant. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. According to the petitioner, it was a consensual relationship. However, the victim is aged about seventeen years and has also become pregnant. Therefore, in view of the serious allegations against the petitioner, this Court is of the firm view that the petitioner is not entitled for anticipatory bail and this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
03-07-2026 ep https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 16918 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To:- 1.The Inspector of Police Erumapatty Police Station, Namakkal. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 16918 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. EP CRL OP No. 16918 of 2026 03-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis