IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90828 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-164 Year-2025 Thana- GRIYAK District- Nalanda ====================================================== Nitish Kumar S/o Bhola Chaudhary Resident of vill- Maira, P.S- Katrisarai, Distt.- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Udbhav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 12-02-2026 Heard the parties. 2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Giriyak (Katrisarai) P.S. Case No. 164 of 2025. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 27.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 57240 of 2025 which reads as under:- “Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This application for grant of regular bail arises out of Giriyak (Katrisarai) P.S. Case No.164 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 339, 340(2), 341(1), 342(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the I.T. Act. 3. The petitioner and other accused persons were arrested with mobile phones, money, documents etc. They were involved in cyber fraud. The petitioner is in custody since 29.04.2025. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90828 of 2025(2) dt.12-02-2026 2/2 4. Considering the fact that the petitioner is involved in cyber fraud, I am not inclined to grant him privilege of regular bail. Accordingly, this bail application is rejected. ” 3. It has very fairly been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the charge has already been framed in this case. 4. In view of the fact that the trial is progressing and the considering the gravity of the offence, this Court finds no new ground to review its earlier order. 5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. 6. The Superintendent of Police, Nalanda is directed to ensure the attendance of the witnesses in the trial. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Superintendent of Police, Nalanda through FAX for its compliance. Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U