Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45375 (MAD)

Mahendran v. The Assistant Commissioner ST

WP/23889/2026 · 2026-07-07

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 23889 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 23889 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.26599 & 26601 of 2026 Mahendran, Proprietor, Tvl. Jayam Engineering Works, 1/344-A, Mettupalayam Road, Attayampalayam, Sembiyanallur PO, Avinashi, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu. 641654 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Assistant Commissioner ST Avinashi Assessment circle, Avinashi , Tiruppur I, Tiruppur Tamil Nadu 641654 2. The Branch Manager, Tamilnad Mercantile Bank LTD, D.6/321, Ground Floor, Coimbatore Main Road, NH 47, Avinashi, Tamil Nadu. 614654 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, call for the records on the files of the 1st Respondent herein in GSTIN 33CLKPM1478B1Z9 dated 11.11.2025, Order under section 73 of the TNGST Act, 2017 and the summary of the order in Form GST DRC-07 both dated 11.11.2025 issued in Reference No. ZD3311251788183 for the tax period 2021-22 and consequential order passed in Roc.No. 33CLKPM1478B1Z9/2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23889 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 dated 09.03.2026 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to lift the attachment of the petitioners Bank Account associated with PAN Number - CLKPM1478B held by the petitioner in the 2nd respondent bank. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Jayaprathap A N R For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) for R1 *********** ORDER An order dated 11.11.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the 1st respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a sum of Rs.1,45,604/- https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23889 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 was recovered from the petitioner’s Electronic Credit Ledger pursuant to the impugned order. This aspect is required to be verified and confirmed. 5. Subject to verifying and confirming that about Rs.1,45,604/- was recovered towards the tax demand from the petitioner’s Electronic Credit Ledger, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re- consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of verifying and confirming the recovery. 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 07-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To 1. The Assistant Commissioner ST Avinashi Assessment circle, Avinashi , Tiruppur I, Tiruppur Tamil Nadu 641654 2. The Branch Manager, Tamilnad Mercantile Bank LTD, D.6/321, Ground Floor, Coimbatore Main Road, NH 47, Avinashi, Tamil Nadu. 614654 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23889 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 23889 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.26599 & 26601 of 2026 07-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis