Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4536 (JHR)

DINESH RAI ALIAS DINESH KUMAR ROY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./436/2026 · 2026-02-25

Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:5572 Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 436 of 2026 --------- Dinesh Rai @ Dinesh Kumar Roy, aged about 30 years, Son of Late Yogesh Roy, Resident of Baramuri, P.S.-Dhanbad, P.O. – Baromuri, District-Dhanbad/Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Naveen Kr. Jaiswal, Adv. Mr. Rahul Lamba, Adv Ms. Kanu Priya, Adv Mr. Anish Kamal, Adv. For the Opp. Party : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, APP ---------- 02/Dated: 25th February, 2026 1. The instant application has been filed under Sections 483 and 484 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of bail in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 378 of 2025 registered under Sections 190, 190(1), 190(2), 190(3), 109, 115(2), 121(1), 121(2), 125, 132, 324(4), 351, 352 of BNS and under Section 3 of Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the name of the petitioner was given due to grudge but as a matter of fact he was not present at the place of occurrence and he was merely passing by from the road and he has been made accused in this case amongst other 60-70 persons. 3. Further submission has been made that he is in custody since 18.11.2025. 2026:JHHC:5572 Page | 2 4. Therefore, submission has been made that the present petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the opposite party-State has seriously the prayer for grant of bail. 6. This Court has heard the learned counsel for the parties. 7. This Court taking into consideration the fact that the there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner alleging him part of 60-70 persons and he is in jail custody since 18.11.2025, is of the view that the present application deserves to be allowed. 8. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands allowed. 9. In consequence thereof, the petitioner named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 378 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall not absent himself on the date fixed without any cogent cause. In failure, the learned trial court shall have liberty to pass appropriate order in accordance with law so that the trial be not hindered. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) 25th February, 2026 Alankar/-