[2026:RJ-JP:10675] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3736/2026 Sunil Kumar S/o Deshraj, R/o Bagthar, Police Thana Baseri, District Dholpur (Raj.) (Accused In Present Confined In District Jail Dholpur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Maneesh Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 13/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 282/2025 registered at Police Station Sarmathura, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC and Sections 3/6 and 4/6 of Rajasthan Public Examination Act 1992. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel also contends that the petitioner is in custody since 09.12.2025 and recovery has been effected. Learned counsel further submits that charge-sheet has already been filed and conclusion of trial will take time. Learned counsel submits that co-accused Vishnu Kumar has been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.02.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application [2026:RJ-JP:10675] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3736/2026] No.1086/2026, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove and submits that there is criminal antecedent against accused-petitioner Sunil Kumar S/o Deshraj. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is in custody since 09.12.2025 and charge-sheet has already been filed; there is no criminal antecedent registered against the petitioner and co- accused Vishnu Kumar has been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.02.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.1086/2026 and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Sunil Kumar S/o Deshraj is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he [2026:RJ-JP:10675] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3736/2026] shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J Heena/74