Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : -- Date of pronouncement : 07.07.2026 Date of uploading
: APHC010329372024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1811/2024 Between:
1. PYDI RAMANA @ RAMULU, S/O LATE APPANNA, HINDU, AGED 83 YEARS. CULTIVATION, ORIGINALLY RESIDENT OF FAREEDPETA VILLAGE. PRESENTLY RESIDENT OF KINTALI MILL JUNCTION, KESAVARAOPETA PANCHAYAT AND
PO ETCHERLA (M), SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. KASHATRI KALI SINGH, S/O LATE HARI SINGH, HINDU, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O NEAR. TELUGU DESAM PARTY OFFICE, OPP INDU BEAUTY PARLOUR, SANA STREET (DCCB COLONY) SRIKAKULAM TOWN, PO AND DIST.
2. BODDEPALLI NARSIMHULU, S/O LATE RAMULU, HINDU, AGED 71 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O KINTALI MILL JUNCTION, KESAVARAOPETA PANCHAYAT AND PO. ETCHERLA (M), SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
3. BODDEPALLI APPALANARASAMMA, W/O NARSIMHULU, HINDU, AGED 61 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, R/O KINTALI MILL JUNCTION, KESAVARAOPETAPANCHAYAT AND PO. ETCHERLA (M), SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
4. BODDEPALLI JAYARAM, S/O NARSIMHULU, HINDU, AGED 33 YEARS, CULTIVATION,
R/O KINTALI MILL JUNCTION,
KESAVARAOPETA PANCHAYAT AND PO. ETCHERLA (M), SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
5. BODDEPALLI SWAMY, S/O NARSIMHULU, HINDU, AGED 29 YEARS, CULTIVATION,
R/O KINTALI MILL JUNCTION, KESAVARAOPETA PANCHAYAT AND PO. ETCHERLA (M), SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
6. BODDEPALLI KRISHNA, S/O NARSIMHULU, HINDU, AGED 27 YEARS, CULTIVATION,
R/O KINTALI MILL JUNCTION, KESAVARAOPETA PANCHAYAT AND PO. ETCHERLA (M), SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
7. BODDEPALLI SYAMALA RAO, , SIO NARSIMHULU, HINDU, AGED 25 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O KINTALI MILL JUNCTION, KESAVARAOPETA PANCHAYAT AND PO. ETCHERLA (M), SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. RESP
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to allow the Revision by setting aside the order of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Srikakulam, passed in lA.No.13/2022 in OS.No.345/2008 dated 21.6.2024 and consequently amend the plaint and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in OS.No.345/2008 on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Srikakulam, pending disposal of the petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. O M R LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
::ORDER ::
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the cause in the civil revision petition does not survive for adjudication and the civil revision petition has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No
order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 07.07.2026 TVN
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
10 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1811 of 2024
Date: 07.07.2026 TVN