Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45344 (CAL)

SRI SRI DURGAMATA THAKURANI REP BY SREE GOUTAM MUKHERJEE v. ADHAR NARAYAN MUKHERJEE AND ORS

CO/2911/2024 · 2026-09-30

Dinesh Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.O. 2911 OF 2024 30.09.2026 Sri Sri Durgamata Thakurani represented by Sebait and for himself Sree Goutam Mukherjee Sl no. 31 - Vs – Ct no. 2 Adhar Narayan Mukherjee (since deceased) Sri Sanjay Mukherjee & Ors. P.M. Mr. Dipanjan Datta, Mr. Subhajit Chowdhury, Ms. Esha Basak ...for the petitioner Mr. Supriyo Chattopadhyay, Ms. Debosri Chatterjee ... for WBSEDCL 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the injunction application filed by the plaintiff/petitioner in Title Suit No. 74 of 2012 is decided expeditiously without being influenced by order of the learned Trial Judge dated 20th May, 2023 and order of the learned Appellate Court dated 28th July, 2023. 2. In view of the submissions made the matter is remanded back to the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Second Court Bolpur with a direction to decide the injunction application in Title Suit No. 74 of 2012 preferably within a period of three months in accordance with law after giving the parties an opportunity of being heard. 3. Learned Trial Court shall decide the injunction application independently without being influenced by its order dated 20th May, 2023 and order of the first appellate court dated 28th July, 2023. Learned Trial Court shall not grant in any unnecessary adjournment. 4. It is made clear, that this court has not gone into the merits of the case and no expression made herein shall tantamount to be an expression on the merits of the case. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. 6. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.) 2