Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45322 (MAD)

K.BHASKAR v. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY/COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE ADMINISTRATION,

WP/23689/2026 · 2026-06-29

P T Asha

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 23689 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA WP No. 23689 of 2026 K.Bhaskar S/o.Krishnan, Special Tahsildar (L.A), Salem-Karur Broad Gauge Railway Line Project, Office of District Collector, Namakkal. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Additional Chief Secretary / Commissioner Of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai -5. 2. The District Collector, Namakkal. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose of the appeal of the petitioner dated 23.03.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.N.Pandian For Respondent(s): Mr.L.Gokulraj, Government Advocate ORDER The writ petition is filed for the relief set out below: "directing the first respondent to dispose of the appeal of the petitioner dated 23.03.2026." 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he joined as Direct Assistant in the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23689 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Revenue Department on 28.07.2004 and presently, serving as Special Tahsildar at Namakkal. While so, an inspection was held on 17.05.2022 and alleging certain lapse on the part of the petitioner in handling the file for sanction of patta, the second respondent issued a charge memo dated 01.06.2022. After an enquiry and based upon the explanations given by the petitioner, the second respondent passed an order dated 15.02.2026 imposing punishment of stoppage of increment for a period of six months with cumulative effect without proper appreciation of the facts. 3. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the appellate authority on 23.03.2026 for which there is no response till date. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the relief now sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the first respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s appeal dated 23.03.2026 on merits and in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23689 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 29-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23689 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 P.T.ASHA, J. ssa To 1.The Additional Chief Secretary / Commissioner Of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai -5. 2.The District Collector, Namakkal. WP No. 23689 of 2026 29-06-2026 (1/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis