Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4532 (RAJ)

AKHILESH URF AKHLESH URF JHABBU S/O JAILAL URF JAITYARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4995/2026 · 2026-04-09

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:14840] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4995/2026 Akhilesh Urf Akhlesh Urf Jhabbu S/o Jailal Urf Jaityaram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Talai Ka Baas Bairoj, Police Station Todabheem, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In J/c Hindon City, Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Monu Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 09/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.152/2023 registered at Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli for offences under Section 379 of IPC, 1860. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the present petitioner pertains to the theft of a Bolero car. He submits that the co-accused Dinesh and Rajkumar have already been granted benefit of bail by the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court vide orders dated 12.02.2024 and 31.08.2023 respectively. The matter is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. Petitioner is behind the bars since 16.02.2026 with criminal past [2026:RJ-JP:14840] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4995/2026] of four cases in which he is already bailed out. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioner. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Akhilesh Urf Akhlesh Urf Jhabbu S/o Jailal Urf Jaityaram, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/34