Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:1211
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 973 of 2025
1. Bindu Mahto, aged about 69 years
2. Chhotu Mahto, aged about 59 years
3. Dayal Mahto, aged about 49 years
4. Raju Mahto, aged about 45 years
5. Mohan Mahto, aged about 43 years All sons of Late Jyoti Mahto, residents of village-Dumra, P.O.- Nawagarh, P.S.- Baghmara, Distt.- Dhanbad (Jharkhand)
… … Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. The Additional Collector, Dhanbad, P.O., P.S. and District Dhanbad
3. The Member, Board of Revenue, Jharkhand, Ranchi, having its office at Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand
4. Dhona Mahto
5. Shankar Mahto Both sons of Late Bhola Mahto, resident of Village Dumra, P.O.- Nawagarh, P.S.- Baghmara, Distt.- Dhanbad (Jharkhand)
6. Sunil Mahato, S/o Late Nakul Mahto and grandson of Kishun Mahto
7. Madan Mahato, S/o Late Kishun Mahto Resp. Nos. 6 and 7 are residents of Village-Chitti, P.O.-Barora, P.S. Baghmara, Dist. Dhanbad, Jharkhand … … Opp. Parties
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioners
: Mr. Ramchander Sahu, Advocate
For the Opp. Party No. 4
: Ms. Mahi, Advocate
---
05/16th January 2026
1.
Learned counsel for the parties are present.
2. This petition has been filed for restoration of W.P.(C) No. 5934 of 2007 which stood dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated
20.12.2024.
2026:JHHC:1211
2
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that due to inadvertence, the learned counsel for the petitioners could not mark the cause list and therefore he did not appear on 20.12.2024.
4. Notices were issued to the private opposite parties and notices have been served and as per office note, opposite party nos. 4 and 5 have appeared by filing Vakalatnama, but nobody is appearing on behalf of the opposite party nos. 6 and 7.
5.
Learned counsel for the State has no serious objection, so far as the prayer for restoration is concerned.
6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and being satisfied with the cause shown, the writ petition being W.P. (C) No. 5934 of 2007 is restored to its original file.
7. Office is directed to place W.P.(C) No. 5934 of 2007 before appropriate Bench as per roster.
8. This C.M.P. is accordingly disposed of.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Mukul/-
16.01.2026
Uploaded on ; 17.01.2026