- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010398292024 NC: 2026:KHC:54173 WP No. 19094 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 19094 OF 2024 (SC/ST) BETWEEN: SRI IQBAL AHMED S/O LATE ABDUL WAHAB, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT ZILLAPANCHAYATHI OFFICE, GOLD RAZE SERVICE CENTER BACK SIDE, KOTHITHOPU, TUMAKURU CITY - 572214. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DC COURT, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, TUMAKURU 521201. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AC COURT, TUMAKURU SUB DIVISION, TUMAKURU 572201. 3. SRI NARASIMHAMURTHY S/O LATE VAKKODAIAH, AGED 44 YEARS, R/AT NO. 5TH CROSS, N R COLONY, KOTHITHOPU, TUMAKURU CITY - 572214. 4. SRI ANJANAMURTHY S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RA/T 3RD CROSS, N R COLONY, KOTHITHOPU, TUMAKURU CITY - 572214. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010398292024 NC: 2026:KHC:54173 WP No. 19094 of 2024 5. SRI NARASIMHAMURTHY S/O LATE KUMBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT 3RD CROSS, N R COLONY, KOTHITHOPU, TUMAKURU CITY - 572214. 6. SRI. AHMED PASHA, S/O. LATE MOHAMMED HUSAIN, R/AT 3RD CROSS BAR LINE, TUMAKURU - 572101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. DASAPPA B., ADVOCATE FOR R3 TO R5; R6 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. 2. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 30.07.2026, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it was ordered to be listed today. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010398292024 NC: 2026:KHC:54173 WP No. 19094 of 2024 3. The matter is listed today. As already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 63