Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45281 (CAL)

TANISHA SAMANTA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/27661/2026 · 2026-09-30

Amrita Sinha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L 17 30.09.2026 Court No.24 SD IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION WPA 27661 of 2026 Tanisha Samanta Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee Mr. Dipankar Das Mr. Debodip Ghosh Mr. Kiron Sk. … for the Petitioner. Mr. Sahasrangshu Bhattacharyya, Ld. AGP Mr. Suchindram Bhattacharjee … for the State. 1. Learned advocate for the State respondents submits that the proper EWS certificate has already been issued to the petitioner and she may produce the same at the time of 3rd round of counselling. 2. As it has been brought to the notice of the court that the petitioner deposited the counselling fee of Rs.2,01,500/- only but was not able to participate in the 2nd round of counselling due to error in the EWS certificate, accordingly, the petitioner may be permitted to participate in the 3rd round of counselling without insisting for payment of further counselling fee. 3. The writ petition stands disposed of. 4. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 5. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Amrita Sinha, J.)