22.09.2026 Item no. 29 Ct. No.237 AKG C.R.R. 1245 of 2026 Tapan Mondal Vs. The State of West Bengal Mr. Aditya Sundar Das, Mr. Ansuman Bera, Ms. Paramita Mondal, Ms. Shabnam Yeasmin …for the Petitioners Mr. Kallol Mondal, Ld. P. P. Mr. Subir Ganguly, Mr. Sandeep Prasad Shaw …for the State It has been submitted by learned advocate appearing for the petitioner that the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Contai, has issued a warrant of arrest against the petitioner on account of his failure to appear before the learned Court on the date fixed for hearing in connection with Khejuri Police Station Case No. 104 of 1995 dated August 16, 1995, under Sections 147/148/149/323/324/353/307/379/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, read with Section 9(B) of the Indian Explosives Act, 1884, corresponding to Sessions Case No. 499 of 2021 and G.R. Case No. 666 of 1995, pending before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Contai. It is submitted that, owing to a communication gap between the petitioner and his learned advocate, the petitioner could not appear before the learned Additional Sessions Judge on the date fixed for hearing. 2 Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to surrender before the learned Additional Sessions Judge within a period of three weeks from date. In view of the aforesaid submission, the execution of the warrant of arrest issued against the petitioner shall remain stayed for a period of one month from date, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall surrender before the learned Additional Sessions Judge within the said period. In the event the petitioner surrenders before the learned Additional Sessions Judge within the stipulated period, any application for bail filed by him shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, without being influenced by any observation made in this order. In the event the petitioner fails to surrender in terms of this order within the stipulated period, the warrant of arrest shall stand revived automatically, and the learned Additional Sessions Judge shall be at liberty to execute the same in accordance with law. Accordingly, CRR 1245 of 2026 is disposed of. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the learned advocates for the parties on usual undertakings. (Kausik Chanda, J.)