Laloo Yadav @ Lalu Prasad Yadav v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./90994/2025 · 2026-02-04
Sandeep Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 45234 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 45234 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90994 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2025 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka ======================================================
1. Laloo Yadav @ Lalu Prasad Yadav Son of Shubhak Yadav R/o Village - Bharko, P.S. - Amarpur, Dist. - Banka.
2. Sita Devi Wife of Laloo Yadav @ Lalu Prasad Yadav R/o Village - Bharko, P.S. - Amarpur, Dist. - Banka.
3. Rupa Devi Wife of Sukun Yadav R/o Village - Bharko, P.S. - Amarpur, Dist. - Banka.
4. Kabo Devi @ Kibi Devi Wife of Dhananjay Yadav R/o Village - Bharko, P.S. - Amarpur, Dist. - Banka.
5. Gunjan Devi Wife of Dhirendra Yadav R/o Village - Bharko, P.S. - Amarpur, Dist. - Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. X Wife of Y R/o Village - Sahua Bahiyar, P.S. - Amarpur, Dist. - Banka. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Nandan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 04-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 32 of 2025 registered for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 76, 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 8 of the POCSO Act and Sections 3(1)(r)(s)(w) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are accused of assaulting the victim and abusing the victim by
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90994 of 2025(3) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 taking caste name.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are quite innocent and have not committed any offence. He further submits that the petitioners are the family members of the main accused Nitish Kumar, who was taken into custody and was granted bail by Juvenile Court.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this application for anticipatory bail is allowed.
7. Accordingly, let the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI-cum-Special Judge, POCSO Act, Banka/concerned court below in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 32 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T