Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040001562026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/40/2026 M/s Gungli Enterprises and 2 Ors represented by Shri Gungli Tapok, Son of Late Gungli Tadu, a residence of C Sector, Itanagar, PO and PS Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Rinchin Dondup Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Leki Tsering permanent resident of 028 near Petrol Pump Road Bomdila PO and PS Bomdila West Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh proprietor of M/s R RD Enterprises. 3: Vijay Kumar Modi Age: Occupation : H No.2 Kamal Cottage B/L-1 PO Rehabari PS Paltan Bazar Kamrup Metro District Assam proprietor of M/s T and T Projects Limited T-3 Parmeshwari Building Chatribari Road Guwahati 781001 Assam VERSUS The State of AP and 6 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Page No.# 2/3 Commissioner Power cum Chairman Age: 0 Occupation : Arunachal Pradesh Power Development Agency Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Secretary Power cum Chairman Age: 0 Occupation : Arunachal Pradesh Power Development Agency Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 4:The Chief Engineer (E) Age: 0 Occupation : Central Electrical Zone Department of Power Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 5:The Chief Engineer (P) Age: 0 Occupation : Eastern Electrical Zone cum SNO Saughagya Department of Power Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 6:The Superintending Engineer (E) Age: 0 Occupation : Arunachal Pradesh Electrical Circle No.V Department of Power Ziro Lower Subansiri District. 7:The Executive Engineer (E) Age: 0 Occupation : Kurung Kumey Division Department of Power Sangram Kurung Kumey District Advocate for the Petitioner : Taba Topu, Tem Pahi,Likha Kagung,Tokdak Tamin Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Lissing Perme,SC(Power) Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 22.04.2026 Mr. H. Ete, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty to file afresh. Mr. S. Yirang, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. L. Perme, learned Standing Counsel, Power Department is present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Ete, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty to file afresh. . JUDGE Comparing Assistant