Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4522 (AP)

Maheswarla Sivasankar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/17153/2026 · 2026-06-30

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement :01.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010327232026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION Nos: 17149, 17151, 17153, 17163 & 17176 of 2026 WRIT PETITION NO: 17149/2026 Between: 1. KALLURI SREYA REDDY,, D/O K RAMA KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS REP. BY HIS GPA KALLURI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, S/O.LATEK.THIMMAREDDY AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS. EX SERVICE MAN AND CULTIVATION, R/O RRN COIONY, MADANAPALLE ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, ,REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (MAAND UD), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. - 522 238. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION CDMA, APCRDA COMPLEX, SEED AXIS ROAD, RAYAPUDI, AMARAVATI. GUNTUR DISTRICT-522 237. 3. THE DIRECTOR OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, , GOVT, OF ANDHRA PRADESH, 6 FLOOR, APCRDA PROJECT OFFICE BUILDING, RAYAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.-522 237. 4. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, 2 HN,J W.P.Nos.17149 of 2026 & batch REVENUE COLONY, SATYADEVA NAGAR, ANANTAPUR-515 004. 5. THE MADANAPALLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT- 517 325. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus , declaring the action of the respondents in not Regularizing the individual Plot situated in Sy. No. 509-4, Ward No. 3, Madanapalli Municipality, Annamayya District by considering the application No. LRS2020/ANMY/MPL/3/1 19058, dated 20.04.2026 as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, void, contrary to law, violative of the Andhra Pradesh Regularisation of unapproved layouts and plots Rules, 2020 issued in G.O.Ms.No. 10, Municipal Administration and Urban Development (M) Department, dated 08.01.2020 and its subsequent amendments, consequently the respondents, particularly, the respondent No. 5, be directed to Regularize the individual Plot situated in Sy. No. 509-4, Ward No. 3, Madanapalli Municipality, Madanapalle, Annamayya District, by considering the LRS application No. LRS2020/ANMY/MPL/3/119058, dated 20.04.2026 in terms of the Andhra Pradesh Regularisation of unapproved i layouts and plots Rules, 2020, and its subsequent amendments, forthwith and to pass and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 5 to regularize the individual Plot situated in Sy. No. 509-4, Ward No. 3, Madanapalli Municipality, Madanapalle, Annamayya District, by considering the LRS application No. LRS2020/ANMY/MPL/3/119058, dated 20.04.2026 in terms of the Andhra Pradesh Regularization of unapproved layouts and plots Rules, 2020,and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S V MUNI REDDY 3 HN,J W.P.Nos.17149 of 2026 & batch Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 4 HN,J W.P.Nos.17149 of 2026 & batch The Court made the following Common Order: The petitioners have purchased plots on different dates in Sy.No.509 of 2004. The plots were unapproved plots and the petitioners for the purpose of developing the same would have to regularize the plots by referring to G.O.Ms.No.10 issued by the 1st respondent. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the petitioners have submitted applications in the month of April, 2026, seeking regularization of the plots under L.R.S. scheme. It is also submitted that the petitioners have paid the requisite fee for regularization of the plots of the petitioners. It is further submitted that the petitioners ought to take a decision on the applications of the petitioners on or before 02.07.2026. It is also submitted that as on date, the respondents have not taken any decision on the application of the petitioners. It is also submitted that unless the plots layouts are regularized, the petitioners would be enabled to develop the plots into residential units or put them to improper use. 3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 5th respondent – Madanapalle Municipality, on written instructions, submits that the applications of the petitioners could not be considered as they are several litigations over the property. 4. It is further submitted that the 5th respondent has identified certain civil suits, which are pending and the Writ Petition bearing No.3350 of 2014, which 5 HN,J W.P.Nos.17149 of 2026 & batch is pending for consideration before this Court and that, Execution Petitions are also pending before the Trial Court. 5. On these considerations, the respondents are enabled to proceed further with the disposal of the applications of the petitioners. 6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in reply submits that the Civil Suit and the Civil Revision Petition was dismissed and that, the dispute between the petitioners and the third parties has nothing to do with the respondents in considering the applications of the petitioners in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.10. 7. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 5th respondent, the present Writ Petition can be disposed off, directing the respondents concerned to pass necessary orders on the applications filed by the petitioners and communicate the said orders to the petitioners. 8. Needless to mention, the concerned respondents shall have to pass appropriate orders within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of the order on the applications submitted by the petitioners. 9. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. 6 HN,J W.P.Nos.17149 of 2026 & batch As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________ HARINATH.N, J Date:01.07.2026 KPV Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 7 HN,J W.P.Nos.17149 of 2026 & batch 204 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.17149, 17151, 17153, 17163 & 17176 of 2026 01.07.2026 KPV