Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45207 (PAT)

Mauzi Lal @ Moji Lal Singh v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./143/2026 · 2026-01-20

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.143 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-260 Year-2025 Thana- HASPURA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1. Mauzi Lal @ Moji Lal Singh S/O Moti Lal @ Moti Lala @ Moti Lal Yadav R/O Village-Jakhaira, P.S Haspura, District- Aurangabad. 2. Uday Yadav @ Uday Kumar S/O- Rajendra Yadav R/O village- Kaji Bigha, P.S Haspura, District-Aurangabad. 3. Umesh Yadav S/O- Rameshwar Yadav R/O Village-Dilawarpur (Magargathiya), P.S-Haspura, District-Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Mukul Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 20-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 118(1), 324(4), 324(5), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per F.I.R., all the named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted informant and his family members and fired upon the pick-up van. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. On Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.143 of 2026(2) dt.20-01-2026 2/2 account of petty dispute, clash broke out between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. Injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature. Case and counter case. Rest of the allegations are ornamental. It is further submitted that though petitioners are alleged to have fired but no one sustained any firearms injury. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the nature of accusation, injuries and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Aurangabad in connection with Haspura P. S. Case No. 260 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T