Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4519 (PAT)

Ramesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./28664/2026 · 2026-04-30

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28664 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2026 Thana- EXCISE MAHUWA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ramesh Kumar S/O Nawal Kishore Bhagat RO Village - Chak Arjani, P.S- Goraul, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Chetna, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 30-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in Excise Mahua P. S. Case No. 24 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per prosecution case, total 491.04 liters illicit liquor was recovered from differed seized vehicles. Petitioner is owner of one of the seized vehicles. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no incriminating material has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery and he has been made accused in this case only on suspicion. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28664 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026 2/2 6. Considering the fact that petitioner is owner of one of the seized vehicles, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T