VASANTH RAO N HULI v. MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LTD
CA/264/2018 · 2026-10-01
Jyoti M
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 45179 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 45179 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010457012018 NC: 2026:KHC:54977 CA No. 264 of 2018 In COP No.37 of 2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 264 OF 2018 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.37 OF 2003 BETWEEN:
VASANTH RAO N HULI S/O NARAYAN RAO HULI AGED 85 YEARS OCCUPATION: RETIRED CAO R/AT KANAKAGERI BUILDING 6TH CROSS, MALAMADDI DHARWAD …APPLICANT
(BY SRI. V.PADMANABHA KEDILAYA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LTD., HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT SYNDICATE HOUSE, UPENDRANAGAR, MANIPAL - 576 119. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. G.KRISHNAMURTHY, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ASHOK G.V., ADVOCATE)
THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE READ WITH RULE 9 OF RULES FRAMED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956.
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010457012018 NC: 2026:KHC:54977 CA No. 264 of 2018 In COP No.37 of 2003
THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.G.Krishnamurthy., Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri.Ashok G.V., for the respondent appeared in person.
There is no representation on behalf of counsel for the applicant.
CA No.264/2018 is filed seeking certain reliefs.
Senior Counsel Sri.G.Krishnamurthy., on instructions submits that the entire amount has been paid and also signed the discharge certificate. However, after the receipt of the entire amount and signing of the discharge receipt, he sought payment of interest without considering the signing of the discharge receipt.
Counsel therefore submits that the applicant is not entitled for the amount.
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010457012018 NC: 2026:KHC:54977 CA No. 264 of 2018 In COP No.37 of 2003
Submission is placed on record.
Taking note of the fact that the entire amount has been paid and signing of the discharge receipt, the applicant is not entitled to seek further amount. Hence, he is stopped from seeking any payment in the matter. Accordingly, CA No.264/2018 is dismissed.
SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
CH List No.: 1 Sl No.:12