Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45178 (MAD)

S.Sudhakar v. Mahendran

CMP(MD)/6272/2026 · 2026-07-01

P Vadamalai

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP(MD) NO. 6272 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01-07-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI CMP(MD) NO. 6272 of 2026 in AS(MD) NO. 227 of 2021 1.S.Sudhakar 2.S.Priya Petitioner(s) Vs 1.Mahendran Rani (Died) 2.Chandrakantham 3.Rajalakshmi 4.Sargunam 5.Senthilkumar 6.Selvaraj 7.Radha Respondent(s) 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NO. 6272 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Anto Prince, Advocate For Respondent(s): Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai, Advocate for R1 Mr.V.Chandrasekar, Advocate for R2 & R3 R4 to R7 – ex parte Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure to implead the petitioners as the respondents 7 and 8 in A.S.(MD) No. 227 of 2021 before this Court. ORDER This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to implead the petitioners herein as respondents 7 and 8 in A.S.(MD)No.227 of 2021 before this Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the affidavit filed in support of this petition. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NO. 6272 of 2026 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that, after the passing of the final decree and after possession of the suit property had been taken, the petitioners subsequently purchased the property. However, they failed to implead themselves as parties to the proceedings. He further submitted that, in view of the subsequent purchase of the property after the conclusion of the final decree proceedings, the petitioners are necessary and proper parties to the present proceedings for the purpose of protecting their title, possession, and enjoyment of the property. Hence, they seek to implead themselves as respondents 7 and 8 in the present appeal. 4. The learned counsel for the 1st respondent and the learned counsel for respondents 2 & 3 did not raise any objections to this petition. They further submitted that the main appeal may be listed for final hearing. 5. Respondents 4 to 6 had already been set ex parte, as recorded in the case bundle. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NO. 6272 of 2026 6. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, and also taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the 1st respondent and the learned counsel for respondents 2 & 3, this Court is inclined to allow this petition. 7. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. 01-07-2026 Note : The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the appeal memorandum and list the main Appeal Suit under the caption “For Final Hearing” on 07.07.2026. mkn 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NO. 6272 of 2026 P.VADAMALAI, J. mkn CMP(MD) NO. 6272 of 2026 in AS(MD) NO. 227 of 2021 01.07.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis