Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4517 (ORI)

SARAT KUMAR PRUSTY v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/6741/2026 · 2026-04-27

B P Routray

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.6741 of 2026 Sarat Kumar Prusty …. Petitioner Mr. B. Mohapatra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and another …. Opposite Parties Mr. T.K. Dash, A.G.A. CORAM: JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER 27.04.2026 Order No. 01. 1. Heard Mr. B. Mohapatra, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. T.K. Dash, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State-Opposite Parties. 2. The Petitioner has prayed for disposal of his representation under Annexure-4 wherein he has sought permission to sell the land in question. The land stands recorded in the name of Lord Jagannath and as per Annexure-2, and it is the Amruta Manohi property of Lord Jagannath where the Petitioner is the Marfatdar. 3. As such, permission sought for by the Petitioner in his representation under Annexure-4 cannot be considered unless the Petitioner is the owner of the land concerned. 4. Hence, the prayer of the Petitioner in the writ petition is not entertained and the writ petition is dismissed. ( B.P. Routray) Judge B.K. Barik