Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45158 (KAR)

SMT. S ANNAPOORNA v. STATE BY

CRL.P/8006/2020 · 2026-10-06

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010403392020 NC: 2026:KHC:55780 CRL.P No. 8006 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8006 OF 2020 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. S ANNAPOORNA W/O R C CHANDRANNA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO 951, 8TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN, ARAVINDA NAGAR, MYSORE - 570 023. 2. SMT. S. TEJAVATHI W/O NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO 3/226, 1ST NACHANA PALYA, VIDYARANYAPURAM MANANDAVADI ROAD, MYSORE - 570 008. 3. SMT. S. PRAMEELA W/O DODDAMADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT 464, 18TH CROSS, 23RD MAIN, NEAR POLICE BOTH, J P NAGAR, VIDYARANYAPURAM MYSORE - 570 008. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. PARINEETA S. CHANAL FOR SRI. SUDEEP BANGERA.,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010403392020 NC: 2026:KHC:55780 CRL.P No. 8006 of 2020 AND: 1. STATE BY WOMENS POLICE STATION MYSORE CITY, MYSORE, REP BY LD. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SMT. PUNEETHA H S W/O SIDDLINGAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, HAIRIGE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, H D KOTE TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT, MYSORE. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED AYUB ALI ADDL. SPP FOR R1 SRI. KUMARASWAMY M.,ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.52/2017 AGAINST COMPLAINT AND CHARGE SHEET IN C.C.NO.327/2019 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498A R/W 34 OF IPC NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE VII ADDITIONAL SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MYSORE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010403392020 NC: 2026:KHC:55780 CRL.P No. 8006 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 06.10.2026 seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition on the ground that they are not pressing the prayer as sought in the petition. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents also submits that trial Court already acquitted the petitioners on 21.04.2026. 3. In that view of the matter, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE RU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44