Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45127 (MAD)

V.Nandhini v. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison

WP Crl.(MD)/3316/2026 · 2026-06-30

A D Jagadish Chandira, R Poornima

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30-06-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R. POORNIMA WP Crl.(MD) NO. 3316 of 2026 V.Nandhini Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, O/o.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison and Correctional Services, Salem Range, Salem Central Prison Campus, Salem District. 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, O/o.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison and Correctional Services, Madurai Range, Madurai Central Prison Campus, Madurai District. 3. The Superintendent of Prison, Salem Central Jail, Salem District. 4. The Commissioner of Police, O/o.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City. 5. The Inspector of Police, O/o.The Inspector of Police, Avaniyapuram Police Station, Madurai. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Lenin Kumar, Counsel for State of Tamilnadu(Crl.Side) Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the impugned order passed by the Respondent No.3 in No.664/Thaku4/2026 dated 12.06.2026 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to grant Emergency leave for the period of 15 days to the petitioner's husband Velmurugan, son of Karuppanan (PID No.305576) who is a life convict prisoner, languishing in Salem Central Prison. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble A.D.Jagadish Chandira, J.) Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the convict prisoner was earlier granted parole for performing his marriage and after marriage, his wife/petitioner is now pregnant and therefore, she made an application to the respondents seeing emergency leave to her husband to take care of her. The respondents have rejected the same vide impugned order and challenging the same, this writ petition has been filed. 2. Learned Counsel for State of Tamilnadu(Crl.Side) would submit that the convict prisoner has got pending cases. However, emergency leave cannot be granted on the ground of visiting the pregnant wife and further, the convict prisoner has not completed three years, as such he is not eligible for availing ordinary leave. Hence, the authorities have rightly passed the impugned order which does not require interference by this Court. 3. We find merits in the contention of the learned Counsel for State of Tamilnadu(Crl.Side). Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. No costs. (A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J.) (R.POORNIMA J.) 30-06-2026 bala To 1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, O/o.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison and Correctional Services, Salem Range, Salem Central Prison Campus, Salem District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, O/o.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison and Correctional Services, Madurai Range, Madurai Central Prison Campus, Madurai District. 3. The Superintendent of Prison, Salem Central Jail, Salem District. 4. The Commissioner of Police, O/o.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City. 5. The Inspector of Police, O/o.The Inspector of Police, Avaniyapuram Police Station, Madurai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis