Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 451 (ORI)

KUNDAN KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA

WP(C)/164/2026 · 2026-01-08

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.164 of 2026 Kundan Kumar …. Petitioner Mr. A. Mohanty, Adv. -versus- Union of India & Anr. …. Opposite Parties Mr. M. Kumar, CGC COROM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 08.01.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under these circumstances, the petitioner humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this writ application, call for relevant records of the case, issue Rule NISI calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the order of cancellation of offer letter dtd. 16.08.2025 as under Annexure-5 shall not be quashed/set-aside and direct the concerned authorities to re-verify the residential address of the petitioner as per the documents provided by him and issue writ of mandamus directing the opposite party No.2 to allow the petitioner for completion of his training for the post of Constable (GD) in BSF. And if the opposite parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause, the said Rule NISI may be made absolute in granting the relief prayed for. And further may pass any other order(s)/direction(s) as this Hon'ble court deems just and proper; And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. It is contended by the learned counsels appearing for the parties that the issue involved in present Writ Petition is covered by an order of this Court so passed on 01.12.2025 in W.P.(C) No.28465 of 2025 and batch. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions made, this Court while quashing order dated 16.08.2025 so issued under Annexure-5 by O.P. No.2, disposed of the present Writ Petition in the light of the order passed on 01.12.2025 in W.P.(C) No.28465 of 2025 and batch. 6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Jyoti