1 Serial No. 04 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No. 128 of 2026 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 Shri. Hamlesstar Shylla, S/o Shri. Kromding Shangdiar, R/o Photjaud War Village, South West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. .…….. Applicant -Vs- The State of Meghalaya through the Public Prosecutor, The High Court of Meghalaya at Shillong. ……… Opposite Party Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. E. Laloo, Legal Aid Counsel. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N.D. Chullai, AAG with Mr. E.R. Chyne, GA. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No 2026:MLHC:706-DB 2 Per W. Diengdoh, (J): JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. Heard Mr. E. Laloo, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant, who has submitted that the applicant has preferred an appeal before this Court against the impugned judgment and related order of sentence dated 28.02.2024 passed by the Court of the learned Special Judge (POCSO), South West Khasi Hills District, Mawkyrwat in Special (POCSO) Case No. 14 of 2018 (Old)/ Special (POCSO) Case No. 8 of 2021 (New), whereby, he was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10(ten) years with fine of ₹ 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) only, and in default thereof, to undergo simple imprisonment of 1(one) week for an offence punishable under Section 5(l)(m)(n)/6 POCSO Act. 2. However, while preferring an appeal, a delay of 800 days has occurred, due to circumstances which is beyond the control of the applicant, being a daily wage labourer and economically backward and illiterate, has no means to engage a private counsel, as such, he could not prefer an appeal within the statutory period. Thus, legal aid was sought for, and accordingly, this application was processed through Legal Aid Counsel. It is therefore prayed that the delay be condoned and the appeal be admitted. 3. Mr. N.D. Chullai, learned AAG assisted by Mr. E.R. Chyne, learned 2026:MLHC:706-DB 3 GA appearing for the State respondent has no objection to the prayer for condonation of the delay. 4. On consideration of the submission made, we are persuaded to allow this application on being satisfied that the grounds cited for the delay contain sufficient cause. Accordingly, the delay of 800 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned. 5. Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list it for admission after 1(one) week. 6. Misc. Case disposed of. (B. Bhattacharjee) (W. Diengdoh) Judge Judge 2026:MLHC:706-DB Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2026.07.13 19:38:15 IST