IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90154 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2018 Thana- KAJRA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Karelal Koda @ Pyarelal Koda S/O Dina Koda R/O Vill.- Kanimoh,P.S-Kajra (Bannu Bagicha),Dist- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 12-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. This is the 2nd attempt of the petitioner. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Lakhisarai Kajra P.S. Case No. 11 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307 of the Indian Penal Code; Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 16, 17, 18, 20 and 23 of U.A.P. Act. 3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected on 23.04.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 21184 of 2025 which reads as follows:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 11 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90154 of 2025(2) dt.12-02-2026 2/2 353, 307 of the Indian Penal Code; Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 16, 17, 18, 20 and 23 of U.A.P. Act. 3. As per the allegation, 43 named accused persons including the petitioner as also 40-45 unknown persons alleged to be naxals by the police, had assembled for commission of offence, according to the information received by the police. The further allegation is that there were firing and cross-firing, as a result, one Constable got injured by the bullet injury. 4. The petitioner is a naxal. The naxals have firedupon the police and injuries have been caused to the police party. The petitioner is in custody since 28.08.2024. Nine serious and similar cases are pending against the petitioner. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. 4. The case has proceeded at the stage of cognizance. This Court finds no ground to review its earlier order. Accordingly, this application for regular bail is hereby rejected. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U