Brijesh Kumar @ Viresh Kumar v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./88828/2025 · 2026-01-15
Smt Soni Shrivastava
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 45083 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 45083 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88828 of 2025 Arising out of PS. Case No.-422 Year-2025 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Brijesh Kumar @ Viresh Kumar S/o Dukhi Rai R/o Village- Khagani, P.S- Turkauliya, Dist- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manjeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 2 15-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Turkaulia P.S. Case No. 422 of 2025 registered under sec- tions 115(2), 75(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 324(4) & 3(5) of the BNS. 3. The allegation in the First Information Report is that the accused persons including the petitioner were indulged in assaulting the informant and other family members while the petitioner Brijesh Kumar tried to outrage the modesty of Hewati Devi. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset sub-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88828 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/3 mits that the present First Information Report has been filed af- ter inordinate delay on 01.09.2025 while the occurrence took place on 10.08.2025 and no plausible explanation has been ten- dered for such delay. It is further submitted that the narration of the FIR would itself disclose that there is no allegation of any assault upon the petitioner but for some ornamental allegation of outraging modesty. It is also submitted that Section 109 BNS would not be attracted against the petitioner even assuming the allegations to be correct. 5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State. 6.
Taking into consideration the facts and circum- stances of the case and considering the inordinate delay in the FIR coupled with the ornamental allegation imputed upon the present petitioner, let the petitioner, above named who has no criminal antecedent, in the event of his arrest or surrender be- fore the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 422 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari, subject to the condition
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88828 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 3/3 laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Proce- dure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023 and subject to the fur- ther condition that he shall co-operate in investigation/trial. Vikash/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T