Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45077 (MAD)

M.John Vasantha Kumar v. The State of Tamilnadu Reb by The Superintendent of Police

WP Crl.(MD)/3665/2026 · 2026-07-06

L Victoria Gowri

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP CRL.(MD). No.3665 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 06/07/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI WP CRL.(MD). No.3665 of 2026 M.John Vasantha Kumar ... Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu Reb By the Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi -627 811. 2. The Superintendent of Police, District, Sivagangai. 3. The Inspector of Police, Kadaiyam Police Station, Tenkasi District. 4. The Inspector of Police, Kalaiyarkoil Police Station, Sivagangai District. 5. V.Aiyammal 6. V.Balasuraaman 7. N.Jayapal 8. Antony Samy 9. A.Antony Mariaselvin ... Respondents 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.3665 of 2026 PRAYER :- To issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.04.2026, in the light of the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No.G4/794/ E-13838276/2026 dated 10.06.2026 and to take appropriate action against the respondents 5 to 9, within a time frame as stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr. Vino V, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy- for R1 to R4 Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER This Writ Petition is filed seeking to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.04.2026, in the light of the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No.G4/794/ E-13838276/2026 dated 10.06.2026 and to take appropriate action against the respondents 5 to 9, within a time frame as stipulated by this Court. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.3665 of 2026 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had sent a representation seeking action against the respondents 5 to 9 with respect to the cheating of Rs.60 Lakhs from the petitioner. However, no proper action was taken, and therefore, this petition was filed. 3. The learned Government Advocate submitted that a complaint has been received by the fourth respondent through the first respondent and the same is pending with the fourth respondent. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials before this Court. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed against the respondents 5 to 9, notice to them is dispensed with. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the fourth respondent police is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.04.2026 and conduct an enquiry in this regard, after issuing summons to the parties concerned, under Section 64 of the BNSS, and 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.3665 of 2026 conclude the same, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. This writ petition is disposed with the above directions. 06.07.2026 NCC : yes / no Index : yes / no Note : Issue order copy on 08.07.2026 pnn To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi -627 811. 2. The Superintendent of Police, District, Sivagangai. 3. The Inspector of Police, Kadaiyam Police Station, Tenkasi District. 4. The Inspector of Police, Kalaiyarkoil Police Station, Sivagangai District. 5. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.3665 of 2026 L. VICTORIA GOWRI,J pnn ORDER IN WP CRL.(MD) No.3665 of 2026 Date : 06/07/2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis