Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4507 (RAJ)

SURESH AJMERA (MALI) SON OF SHRI PRABHUNARAYAN AJMERA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6976/2021 · 2026-03-12

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10472] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.6976/2021 1. Suresh Ajmera (Mali) Son Of Shri Prabhunarayan Ajmera, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 01-A, Awasiya Yojna, Ajmera Farm, Village- Sukhiya, Tehsil- Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Prabhunarayan Ajmera ( Mali) Son Of Shri Chotelal, Aged About 76 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 01-A, Awasiya Yojna, Ajmera Farm, Village- Sukhiya, Tehsil- Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Pappu Singh Son Of Bhagirath Singh, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Plot No. 01, Ikar Nagar, Kalyanpura, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya Joshi for Mr. Vikas Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Mr. Amandeep JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 12/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, during pendency of the instant criminal misc. petition, the parties have settled their dispute by way of entering into compromise, hence, under these circumstances, no cause of action survives with the petitioners to continue with this petition. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent- complainant also accepts the factum of compromise between the [2026:RJ-JP:10472] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6976/2021] parties and submits that the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioners. 3. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, and looking to the fact that the allegations levelled against the petitioners are personal in nature and also applying the principles of law as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 & State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan & Ors., reported in (2019) 5 SCC 688, this Court deems it just and appropriate to invoke the inherent powers of this Court under Section 528 BNSS. 4. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition is allowed. The criminal proceedings pending before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate No.14, Jaipur Metropolitan City arising out of impugned FIR No.403/2018 registered with Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South), stands quashed and set- aside. The petitioners are discharged from the charge under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC. 5. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/14