Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45050 (MAD)

S.Poorani v. The Registrar General

WP/25573/2026 · 2026-07-06

N Senthilkumar, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 25573 of 2026 __________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR WP No. 25573 of 2026 S.Poorani W/o Vadivel, No 19, Muthusamy Main street, KNP Puram, Odakkadu, Tiruppur District 641 602 ..Petitioner Vs The Registrar General High Court of Madras, Chennai-104 ..Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to frame appropriate Rules in terms Rejanish Vs. K Deepa ( 2025 INSC 1208) to include the Presidents of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions, Tamil Nadu on par with judicial officers for the purpose of participation in the examination for appointment to the post of District Judge (Direct Recruitment) under Article 233 (2) of the Constitution of India by considering petitioner representation dated 08.04.2026 made to the respondent within a time frame. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Prabakar For Respondent : Mr.S.Giridharan, Standing Counsel for Respondent https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25573 of 2026 __________ Order (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Writ of Mandamus has been instituted to direct the respondent to frame appropriate rules in in terms Rejanish Vs. K Deepa ( 2025 INSC 1208) to include the Presidents of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions, Tamil Nadu on par with judicial officers for the purpose of participation in the examination for appointment to the post of District Judge (Direct Recruitment) under Article 233 (2) of the Constitution of India by considering petitioner representation dated 08.04.2026 made to the respondent within a time frame. 2. The writ petition has been filed based on presumptions and assumptions, thus premature. The petitioner has not established any cause of action for institution of the writ proceedings. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in the event of issuing any recruitment notification for direct recruitment to the post of District Judge (Entry level), the petitioner may be permitted to participate in the examination. Eligibility or non-eligibility cannot be presumed by a candidate. Only on issuance of notification, if any grievance arises an aggrieved person may approach the competent authorities in the manner known to law. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25573 of 2026 __________ 3. However, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner submitted a representation before the High Court, which was forwarded to the Committee for consideration. 4. Mere submission of a representation without any cause per se would not constitute a ground for institution of writ proceedings. Thus, the writ petition being premature, stands dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (N.S.,J.) 06-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KST To The Registrar General High Court of Madras, Chennai-104 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25573 of 2026 __________ S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND N.SENTHILKUMAR J. KST WP No. 25573 of 2026 06-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis