Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4504 (GAU)

MD KHALIL UDDIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Civil)/921/2026 · 2026-04-20

Anjan Moni Kalita

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010262922022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) I.A.(Civil)/921/2026 MD KHALIL UDDIN S/O- LATE ABDUL JABBAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RANGPUR PART-VIII P.S.- KATLICHERRA DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788163. 2: MD ROIS UDDIN S/O- LATE MOFUR ALIRESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RANGPUR PART-VIIIP.S.- KATLICHERRA DISTRICT- HAILAKANDIASSAM PIN- 788163 2: MUST. ANGURA BIBI S/O KAMIL UDDIN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RANGPUR PART-VIII P.S.- KATLICHERRA DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788163. 3: MD ROSID ALI S/O- MD. WAJID ALIRESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RANGPUR PART-VIIIP.S.- KATLICHERRA DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI 4: MD LAKI MIA S/O MD. KHOLIL UDDINRESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RANGPUR PART-VIIIP.S.- KATLICHERRA DISTRICT- HAILAKANDIASSAM PIN- 788163. 5: MD KABIR UDDIN S/O- MD. KHALIL UDDINRESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RANGPUR PART-VIIIP.S.- KATLICHERRA DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI 6: MD SHAM S/O- LATE VERAI MIARESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RANGPUR PART-VIIIP.S.- KATLICHERRA DISTRICT- HAILAKANDIASSAM PIN- 788163. VERSUS Page No.# 2/2 THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE PP 2.1:MUSTT HAFSA BEGUM CHOUDHURY W/O GULAM MUSTAFA CHOUDHURYVILL- RANGAUTI PART-II P.S. DIST-HAILAKANDI ASSAM-788155. 2.2:MD FAYZUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY S/O GULAM MUSTAFA CHOUDHURYVILL- RANGAUTI PART-II P.S. DIST-HAILAKANDI ASSAM-788155. ------------ Advocate for : MR A NATH Advocate for : MR. A H M R CHOUDHURY appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER 21.04.2026 The instant interlocutory application has been filed to substitute the respondent no. 2 in the connected writ petition by (i) Mustt. Hafsa Begum Choudhury; and (ii) Md. Fayzur Rahman Choudhury, wife and son of the respondent no. 2 respectively. Mr. B. Chakravarty, learned counsel for the applicant submits that since the respondent no. 2 expired the present interlocutory application has been filed seeking substitution of the respondent no. 2 in the connected writ petition. The prayer is allowed. The interlocutory application is disposed of with a direction to file amended cause-title in the connected writ petition within a period of 1 (one) week from today bringing on record the names of the aforesaid two legal heirs of the earlier respondent no. 2. JUDGE Comparing Assistant