Date of reserved for orders : -- Date of pronouncement : 02.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010160202026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1373/2026 Between: 1. DIVIKOLU SUBBARAO, S/O. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RIO. D.NO. 2-46A, MAMILAPALLI VILLAGE, SANTHAMAGULURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. CHINTALAPUDI NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O. MANSTHAN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RIO. D.NO. 2-174/A, MAMILLAPALLI VILLAGE, SANTHAMAGULURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. PUSUKURI POTHURAJU,, S/O. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RIO. D.NO. 1-51 CL, MAMILLAPALLI VILLAGE, SANTHAMAGULURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. SHIK BUDE SAHEB,, S/O. MAVULA SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 2-80, MAMILLAPALLLI VILLAGE, SANTHAMAGULURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. CHIMATA RAMBABU,, S/O. VEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 1-111/A, MAMILLAPALLLI VILLAGE, SANTHAMAGULURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. UPPALAPATI NAGA SUBBAMMA,, W/O. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1-26/B, MAMILLAPALLLI VILLAGE, SANTHAMAGULURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. BOMMIDI GURAVAIAH,, S/O. CHINNA VEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RIO. D.NO. 1-115C, MAMILLAPALLLI VILLAGE, SANTHAMAGULURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI KATTA VENKATESWARLU, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATIONS, APCPCDL, (PREVIOUSLY IN BAPATLA) NOW ONGOLE CIRCLE, ONGOLE-523001, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. SRI N MASTHAN RAO, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OPERATION DIVISION, APCPDCL, (PREVIOUSLY IN BAPATLA), ADDANKI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT A.P.523201 3. SRI MUVVA SURENDRABABU, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OPERATIONS, APCPDCL, MARTUR-523301. 4. SRI DEEPAK REDDY, ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OPERATIONS, APCPDCL, SANTHAMAGULURU, PRAKASAM DIST- 523302. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to prosecute the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for their willful and deliberate violation of the orders dated 11.7.2025 passed in W.P.No.1556 of 2025 and punish them and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KOCHIRI RAJA SHEKAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. V V SATISH The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case was filed complaining of a violation of the order dated 11.07.2025 passed in W.P.No.1556 of 2025. Page 3 of 4 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that order dated 11.07.2025 passed in W.P.No.1556 of 2025 has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 02.07.2026 TVN Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 47 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.1373 OF 2026 Date: 02.07.2026 TVN